Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/SK902.61.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(j(x, y), y) → g(f(x, k(y)))
f(x, h1(y, z)) → h2(0, x, h1(y, z))
g(h2(x, y, h1(z, u))) → h2(s(x), y, h1(z, u))
h2(x, j(y, h1(z, u)), h1(z, u)) → h2(s(x), y, h1(s(z), u))
i(f(x, h(y))) → y
i(h2(s(x), y, h1(x, z))) → z
k(h(x)) → h1(0, x)
k(h1(x, y)) → h1(s(x), y)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DirectTerminationProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(j(x, y), y) → g(f(x, k(y)))
f(x, h1(y, z)) → h2(0, x, h1(y, z))
g(h2(x, y, h1(z, u))) → h2(s(x), y, h1(z, u))
h2(x, j(y, h1(z, u)), h1(z, u)) → h2(s(x), y, h1(s(z), u))
i(f(x, h(y))) → y
i(h2(s(x), y, h1(x, z))) → z
k(h(x)) → h1(0, x)
k(h1(x, y)) → h1(s(x), y)

Q is empty.

We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.

Recursive path order with status [2].
Precedence:

j₂ > f₂ > h2₃ > h1₂
j₂ > f₂ > h2₃ > s₁
j₂ > f₂ > 0
j₂ > g₁ > h2₃ > h1₂
j₂ > g₁ > h2₃ > s₁
j₂ > k₁ > h1₂
j₂ > k₁ > 0
j₂ > k₁ > s₁
h₁ > h1₂

Status:

h₁: multiset
j₂: multiset
i₁: multiset
k₁: multiset
h2₃: [2,3,1]
f₂: [1,2]
h1₂: multiset
0: multiset
s₁: multiset
g₁: multiset